Cold Plate Cooling of IGBT Modules – BURAQ CFD
Case Study · Thermal Management

Cold Plate Cooling of
IGBT Modules

Using CFD simulation to diagnose the thermal deficiencies of a cold plate system cooling three IGBT modules dissipating 368 W each — identifying critical thermal risks before physical prototyping.

The Engineering Challenge

Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) modules are power semiconductor devices widely used in motor drives, renewable energy inverters, and traction systems. Excessive junction temperatures are the primary cause of IGBT failure, making thermal management a critical design concern.

In this study, three IGBT modules — each dissipating 368 W — are mounted on a single liquid-cooled cold plate. The baseline design produced temperatures far exceeding the safe limit, triggering this CFD-based thermal risk assessment to diagnose root causes before any physical prototype was built.

Geometry & Simulation Setup

The conjugate heat transfer (CHT) analysis was performed in SimScale. The geometry consists of three IGBT modules bonded to a cold plate via a thermal paste layer, with coolant flowing through internal serpentine channels.

IGBT cold plate assembly — isometric view showing module arrangement and inlet connector
Fig. 1 — Assembly geometry: IGBT modules on cold plate, inlet side
IGBT cold plate assembly — full isometric view with inlet and outlet connectors
Fig. 2 — Full assembly geometry with dual inlet/outlet fittings
Cold plate internal flow channel geometry — top view showing serpentine fin channels
Fig. 3 — Cold plate internal channel geometry (top view): serpentine fin arrangement with narrow interconnecting passages
Device
IGBT Module × 3
Heat dissipation per module
368 W
Cold plate dimensions
270 × 160 × 27 mm
Thermal paste thickness (base)
20 mm
Max. allowable junction temp.
423 K (150 °C)
Target operating temperature
≤ 343 K (70 °C)
Solver
SimScale CHT
Mesh type
Hex-dominant, automated
Base mesh size
1.4 mm
Inflation layers
5 (no-slip condition)
Hex-dominant mesh at inlet cross-section showing inflation layers around the connector
Fig. 4 — Hex-dominant mesh at inlet: inflation layers capturing near-wall boundary layer
Close-up mesh view of cold plate channel junctions showing cell density at sharp transitions
Fig. 5 — Mesh detail at channel transitions: refined cells at sharp corners and narrow sections

Baseline Design: Failure Diagnosis

Simulation of the original design revealed two compounding failure mechanisms. All four IGBT junction temperatures reached approximately 160 °C — far above the 90 °C maximum acceptable value and nearly double the 70 °C ideal operating target.

Bar chart of IGBT junction temperatures in baseline design — all four IGBTs at ~160°C, well above the 90°C and 70°C limit lines
Fig. 6 — Baseline junction temperatures: all IGBTs at ~160 °C, significantly above the 90 °C limit (red) and 70 °C ideal (green)
Problem 1

Pressure Losses in Flow Channel

  • Narrow cross-sections create high flow resistance
  • Sharp bends generate local low-pressure zones
  • Elevated pressure drop opposes coolant movement
  • Uneven velocity across hot-spots
  • Varying heat transfer coefficient → uneven cooling
Problem 2

Thermal Paste Resistance

  • Large temperature gradient across 20 mm paste layer
  • Thick paste acts as an insulating barrier
  • Slows rate of heat removal from IGBTs
  • Compounds with flow issues to push temps over limit
Pressure streamlines through cold plate channels showing sharp pressure drop at the narrow interconnecting section between channels
Fig. 7 — Pressure distribution (Pa) and streamlines: red arrows indicate the critical low-pressure zone at the narrow inter-channel passage where the highest pressure drop occurs
Cross-section temperature and gradient maps — top shows temperature gradient 20-160°C through IGBT and paste layers; bottom shows steep Z-direction gradient in the thermal paste
Fig. 8 — Cross-section analysis: (top) temperature contours showing the 20–160 °C gradient from coolant to IGBT junction; (bottom) Z-direction thermal gradients revealing the dominant resistance in the thick thermal paste layer

Geometry & Material Optimisation

Two targeted modifications were proposed and re-simulated before any physical prototype was manufactured — eliminating costly trial-and-error fabrication cycles.

Fix 1 · Flow Channel

Reduce Hydraulic Resistance

  • Increase minimum cross-section area of the channel
  • Add fillets to eliminate sharp 90° transitions
  • Smoother flow path → lower pressure drop
  • More uniform velocity → consistent heat transfer coefficient
Fix 2 · Thermal Interface

Reduce Thermal Paste Thickness

  • Reduce paste layer thickness by 60%
  • Lower conduction resistance between IGBT and cold plate
  • Higher cold plate surface temp confirms better heat extraction

Validated Improvement

After applying both modifications, re-simulation confirmed that all junction temperatures now fall below the 70 °C ideal target — a dramatic improvement from the 160 °C baseline — with no physical prototype required.

Comparison bar chart: baseline junction temperatures ~160°C (blue) vs improved Design 1 temperatures ~52°C (orange), both shown against the 90°C limit and 70°C ideal lines
Fig. 9 — Junction temperature comparison: baseline (~160 °C, blue) vs. improved design (~52 °C, orange). Design 1 comfortably beats both the 90 °C maximum limit and the 70 °C ideal target.
Cold plate surface temperature map for improved design — streamlines show more uniform flow; colour scale 20-26°C showing elevated plate temperature indicating effective heat extraction from IGBTs
Fig. 10 — Improved design: cold plate surface temperature (20–26 °C). Higher surface temperature confirms effective heat removal from IGBTs. Streamlines show improved flow uniformity through widened channels.
Improved design cold plate temperature field — slightly different view angle showing the same uniform temperature distribution after geometry and paste thickness modifications
Fig. 11 — Improved design: alternate view of cold plate temperature distribution. The more even color gradient (vs. baseline) reflects balanced heat extraction across all four IGBT zones.
160°
→ 52 °C junction temp reduction
60%
Thermal paste thickness reduction
↓ ΔP
Lower pressure drop across channels
0
Physical prototypes needed for validation

Why CFD Before Prototyping Matters

The combined effect of high hydraulic resistance and a thick thermal interface layer created a scenario that simple hand calculations would not have caught. CFD simulation captured the interaction between fluid dynamics and conjugate heat transfer simultaneously, revealing that both flow geometry and material changes were required together to reach safe operating temperatures.

The results also illustrate a key principle in electronics cooling: optimising for temperature alone is insufficient. Pressure drop, flow uniformity, and thermal interface resistance must all be evaluated together in a CHT framework — and resolved before a single part is machined.

Need a Thermal Analysis for Your System?

BURAQ CFD provides conjugate heat transfer and electronics cooling simulations — before you build.

Get in Touch

Our Services

Design your WordPress sites with a more gradient look, and make your icon box more sover.